<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HealthExecNews &#187; World Health Care Innovation and Technology Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthexecnews.com/tag/world-health-care-innovation-and-technology-congress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthexecnews.com</link>
	<description>Healthcare Management News and Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Digital claims could save $11B per year &#8212; should it be mandatory?</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/digital-claims-could-save-11b-per-year-should-it-be-mandatory</link>
		<comments>http://healthexecnews.com/digital-claims-could-save-11b-per-year-should-it-be-mandatory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Bartzak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD On-Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Care Innovation and Technology Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthexecnews.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical practices are still submitting up to 25% of their claims on paper. And it&#8217;s costing everyone big time, according to some experts. Roughly 3 billion claims per year are being processed on paper. And 90% of all claims are paid with paper checks. That&#8217;s enough paper to choke any system. Speaking at the World [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medical practices are still submitting up to 25% of their claims on paper. And it&#8217;s costing everyone big time, according to some experts. <span id="more-509"></span></p>
<p>Roughly 3 billion claims per year are being processed on paper. And 90% of all claims are paid with paper checks.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s enough paper to choke any system.</p>
<p>Speaking at the World Health Care Innovation and Technology Congress, Bill Bartzak, the CEO of MD On-Line, said that most of the paper claims are submitted by smaller practices with five or fewer doctors and that converting those users to electronic claims could save up to $11 billion each year.</p>
<p>Of course, converting the die-hards is easier said than done. Even if doctors are interested in making the switch (not a given), the logistics are more difficult for smaller practices.  They have fewer staffers on hand, and some specialties, like family practice, may have very slim budgets to work with.</p>
<p>In his address, Bartzak suggested making digital claims mandatory for providers and insurers. Would that cause more problems than it would fix? Share your thoughts in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthexecnews.com/digital-claims-could-save-11b-per-year-should-it-be-mandatory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

