<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HealthExecNews &#187; efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthexecnews.com/tag/efficiency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthexecnews.com</link>
	<description>Healthcare Management News and Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 U.S. health systems &#8212; is yours on the list?</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/top-10-u-s-health-systems-is-yours-on-the-list</link>
		<comments>http://healthexecnews.com/top-10-u-s-health-systems-is-yours-on-the-list#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care/Treatment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient/Client Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Cod Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CareGroup Healthcare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evanston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Rapids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyannis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kettering Health Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maury Regional Healthcare System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortality rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NorthShore University HealthSystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Brook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OhioHealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient satisfaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality of care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rochester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthexecnews.com/?p=3729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is your hospital part of the Top 10 health care systems in the U.S.? Read on to find out. Thomson Reuters rated the following health care systems as the cream of the crop when it comes to quality of care, efficiency and patient satisfaction: Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook, IL Cape Cod Healthcare, Hyannis, MA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your hospital part of the Top 10 health care systems in the U.S.? Read on to find out. <span id="more-3729"></span>Thomson Reuters rated <a href="http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/thomson-reuters-names-top-10-us-health-systems" target="_blank">the following health care systems as the cream of the crop</a> when it comes to quality of care, efficiency and patient satisfaction:</p>
<ol>
<li>Advocate Health Care, Oak Brook, IL</li>
<li>Cape Cod Healthcare, Hyannis, MA</li>
<li>CareGroup Healthcare System, Boston</li>
<li>Kettering Health Network, Dayton, OH</li>
<li> Maury Regional Healthcare System, Columbia, TN</li>
<li> Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN</li>
<li> NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL</li>
<li> OhioHealth, Columbus, OH</li>
<li>Partners Healthcare, Boston</li>
<li>Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI</li>
</ol>
<p>Thompson Reuters rated the hospitals on eight key criteria:</p>
<ul>
<li>In-hospital mortality</li>
<li>Medical complications</li>
<li> Patient safety</li>
<li>Average length of stay</li>
<li> 30-day mortality rate (post-discharge)</li>
<li>30-day readmission rate (post discharge)</li>
<li>Adherence to clinical standards of care (evidence-based core  measures published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services</li>
<li> Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems  patient survey score (part of a national initiative sponsored by the  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to measure the quality of  care in hospitals)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthexecnews.com/top-10-u-s-health-systems-is-yours-on-the-list/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advanced EHRs slash ER wait times</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/advanced-ehrs-slash-er-wait-times</link>
		<comments>http://healthexecnews.com/advanced-ehrs-slash-er-wait-times#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EMR & EHR - Electronic Health Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud & Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care/Treatment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Legal & Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient/Client Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 National Hospital Amublatroy Medical Care Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EHRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthexecnews.com/?p=2258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right electronic health records (EHR) system can have a significant impact on key measures of quality. A new study by researchers at Arizona State University looked at patient data from the 2006 National Hospital Amublatroy Medical Care Survey. The research showed that hospitals using advanced EHRs (such as online access to test results, etc.) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right electronic health records (EHR) system can have a significant impact on key measures of quality. <span id="more-2258"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/er-wait-times-reduced-22-percent-advanced-ehrs" target="_blank">A new study</a> by researchers at Arizona State University looked at patient data from the 2006 National Hospital Amublatroy Medical Care Survey.</p>
<p>The research showed that hospitals using advanced EHRs (such as online access to test results, etc.) saw a number of benefits, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>treatment times that were 13% shorter</li>
<li>admitted patients had hospital stays that were 24% shorter, and</li>
<li>patients who were treated and discharged spent 21% less time in the ER.</li>
</ul>
<p>Interestingly, simply using basic EHRs wasn&#8217;t enough to improve speed. Hospitals without EHRs actually outperformed those with basic EHRs &#8212; especially among patients that arrived at the ER with urgent medical problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthexecnews.com/advanced-ehrs-slash-er-wait-times/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hospitals find assembly-line approach saves money; improves outcomes</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/hospitals-find-assembly-line-approach-saves-money-improves-outcomes</link>
		<comments>http://healthexecnews.com/hospitals-find-assembly-line-approach-saves-money-improves-outcomes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud & Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akron Children's Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaizain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Children's Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sterilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical equipement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthexecnews.com/?p=1898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some hospitals are finding that adopting a manufacturer&#8217;s approach to streamlining can benefit both patients and the bottom line. While a factory-style approach to efficiency may seem like the worst thing that could happen to the quality of patient care, the opposite is true. Hospitals that have adopted continuous improvement programs like those used by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some hospitals are finding that adopting a manufacturer&#8217;s approach to streamlining can benefit both patients and the bottom line. <span id="more-1898"></span></p>
<p>While a factory-style approach to efficiency may seem like the worst thing that could happen to the quality of patient care, the opposite is true.</p>
<p>Hospitals that have adopted continuous improvement programs like those used by manufacturers <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/11seattle.html" target="_blank">have found they&#8217;ve improved</a> both their bottom lines and the level of care patients receive.</p>
<p>Seattle Children&#8217;s Hospital has adapted kaizan, a Japanese theory of business management, to continually make small adjustments that reduce waste and create a better experience for patients. It&#8217;s working.</p>
<p>For example, the hospital reorganized the stock room so that there are two constantly rotating bins of supplies. When one is empty, it&#8217;s sent to the central supply, where a scan of the bins bar code automatically orders replacements and nurses use the &#8220;back-up&#8221; bin. The increased efficiency allowed the hospital to cut its stockroom size in half. It also reduced waste, since there are fewer expired or outdated supplies that need to be tossed.</p>
<p>Between that and a number of other, equally small changes, the hospital has seen significant gains. In the past year, Seattle Children&#8217;s reduced its costs per patient by 3.7%, saving $23 million. The increased efficiency also allowed the hospital to serve more patients without incurring capital expenses to expand.</p>
<p>In another example, Akron Children&#8217;s Hospital spent $20,000 to streamline the sterilization process for surgical instruments and handle more operations each year. While the upfront cost might seem steep, it saved the hospital from spending another $3.5 million to expand the department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthexecnews.com/hospitals-find-assembly-line-approach-saves-money-improves-outcomes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telehealth: Who&#8217;s using it and how</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/telehealth-whos-using-it-and-how</link>
		<comments>http://healthexecnews.com/telehealth-whos-using-it-and-how#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care/Treatment trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient/Client Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Intelligence Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rural health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telehealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthexecnews.com/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey shows most health care providers are using telehealth with some success. But getting paid for it remains an on-going battle for many. The survey, conducted by Health Intelligence Network, found 67% of respondents were using telehealth for either clinical or non-clinical purposes. Just under half (49%) use it to remotely monitor patients&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent survey shows most health care providers are using telehealth with some success. But getting paid for it remains an on-going battle for many. <span id="more-964"></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://blog.hin.com/?p=589" target="_blank">survey</a>, conducted by Health Intelligence Network, found 67% of respondents were using telehealth for either clinical or non-clinical purposes. Just under half (49%) use it to remotely monitor patients&#8217; health.</p>
<p>For the most part, providers aren&#8217;t using hi-tech solutions: 72% cited the phone as the most used medium for telehealth. Another 39% said they offer broadband connections for telehealth services.</p>
<p>Other highlights from the survey:</p>
<ul>
<li>The biggest benefit of using telehealth was health care efficiency, cited by 73% of respondents.</li>
<li>Just under 20% of respondents said their biggest headache in implementing telehealth was getting reimbursed for it.</li>
<li>Most of those using telehealth made it available to their entire client base. Only 17% focused its use on the chronically ill; 8% primarily targeted rural patients.</li>
<li>The condition most commonly tracked via telehealth was heart failure.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://healthexecnews.com/telehealth-whos-using-it-and-how/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

