<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EHR systems: Double-edged sword?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthexecnews.com/ehr-systems-double-edged-sword/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthexecnews.com/ehr-systems-double-edged-sword</link>
	<description>Healthcare Management News and Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony F.</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/ehr-systems-double-edged-sword/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcarenews.com/?p=3#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I have seen may EHR Systems that are quite fuctional and very user friendly. I also think this this &quot;EHR&quot; idea is a good-as long as it&#039;s not mandated. What&#039;s next? I live in the USA cause it&#039;s a &quot;Free&quot; country-however the freedom of choice is becoming the exception, rather than the rule.

Once the EHR systems are completed after the mandated time frame, we WILL see that it will become an &quot;intergrated&quot; infrastructure, eventually going mainsteam-which everyone and anyone remotely connected to the healthcare industry, will have total ascess to our neighbor&#039;s information. Oh yes, HIPPA, we&#039;ll need more rules, even better than the ones that never got clearified.

What ever happened to the throwback years of simple medicine, from the caring doctor who delivered us, knew us by our family, putting our healthcare before the copay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen may EHR Systems that are quite fuctional and very user friendly. I also think this this &#8220;EHR&#8221; idea is a good-as long as it&#8217;s not mandated. What&#8217;s next? I live in the USA cause it&#8217;s a &#8220;Free&#8221; country-however the freedom of choice is becoming the exception, rather than the rule.</p>
<p>Once the EHR systems are completed after the mandated time frame, we WILL see that it will become an &#8220;intergrated&#8221; infrastructure, eventually going mainsteam-which everyone and anyone remotely connected to the healthcare industry, will have total ascess to our neighbor&#8217;s information. Oh yes, HIPPA, we&#8217;ll need more rules, even better than the ones that never got clearified.</p>
<p>What ever happened to the throwback years of simple medicine, from the caring doctor who delivered us, knew us by our family, putting our healthcare before the copay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR WYNNE</title>
		<link>http://healthexecnews.com/ehr-systems-double-edged-sword/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>DR WYNNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcarenews.com/?p=3#comment-34</guid>
		<description>EHRS IN PHYSICIANS OFFICES ARE NOT YET READY FOR PRIME TIME. THEY ARE SLOW AND DIFFICULT TO INPUT DATA. YET, THE IDEA IS GREAT !! UNFORTUNATELY, THE TECHNOLOGY IS NOT YET AVAILABLE FOR FAST EFFICIENT AND PRECISE RECORDING OF PT INFO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EHRS IN PHYSICIANS OFFICES ARE NOT YET READY FOR PRIME TIME. THEY ARE SLOW AND DIFFICULT TO INPUT DATA. YET, THE IDEA IS GREAT !! UNFORTUNATELY, THE TECHNOLOGY IS NOT YET AVAILABLE FOR FAST EFFICIENT AND PRECISE RECORDING OF PT INFO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

